Corrections Policy

Email contact@peptideschool.org with the exact page URL, the statement or source in question, a concise explanation, and any supporting primary or authoritative source. Do not send passwords, medical records, full payment-card details, or unrelated sensitive information.

Reports about spelling, accessibility, broken links, wording, evidence scope, regulatory status, and factual accuracy are welcome. A disagreement with a conclusion is reviewed separately from a demonstrable factual or sourcing error.

The Editorial Desk checks the published wording against the cited record, the strongest available source, and the date and context of the claim. A source being newer does not automatically make it stronger; study design and direct relevance still matter.

If the report cannot be confirmed, the page may remain unchanged. If uncertainty is real but unresolved, the wording can be clarified to expose that uncertainty rather than presenting either side as established fact.

Minor typographic, formatting, or link-maintenance edits can be made without changing the substantive conclusion. Material corrections include changes to a factual claim, numerical result, evidence level, regulatory status, attribution, or conclusion that could alter a reader's understanding.

Material changes update the affected page and its review date. Internal editorial history preserves what changed and why; PeptideSchool does not fabricate an earlier publication state or silently rewrite a source-backed conclusion for promotional reasons.

Commercial interest, advertising status, popularity, or pressure from a vendor does not determine whether a correction is accepted. The same evidence standard applies to favorable and unfavorable changes.

A reporter may reply with additional evidence if a correction is declined. PeptideSchool can correct its own material, but it cannot alter a third-party journal, regulator, database, or website reached through an external link.